Tuesday, May 06, 2014

Tuesday

There were three reasons why he had to do this today. 

1.       If it were just one, it would mean too much of importance would be attributed to one particular statement. He didn’t believe in that. He always believed there to be a varied number of reasons for any particular event. 
2.       If it were two, it would be a cliché, he thought. Duality was an oft-used concept by writers and philosophers to confuse their general audience and make them grapple with contradictions and paradoxes.

3.       Because he loved number three. This he observes from his own previous works, which had an unusually large number of ‘three’s in them. 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

three. yes, threesomes as well. unusual number of them.

Govind V said...

Behm Behm. Behm.